hudson vs jenkins

Primary Sidebar. These plugins expand Jenkins into five years; platforms, UI, administration, source code management, and build management. Jenkins can be manually started by opening the Console/Command line and using the below commands: Start Jenkins: jenkins.exe … Hudson vs. Jenkins – more thoughts After having released the last post about Hudson vs. Jenkins, I have read quite a lot about this issue. Share. Hudson vs. Jenkins – Hudsons future. Jenkins supports over 1,400 plugins for other software tools. Existing Atlassian products in use) Access to plug-ins; Desire to build custom plug-ins; … Jenkins 'ticket activity' is significantly higher than that of Hudson. The March to date numbers are more striking: March 1 - 11 it is 244 on Jenkins and 44 on Hudson. Analyze their differences and similarities and discover which one outperforms the other. The Jenkins community is promoting a number of bellwethers that would indicate that Hudson is losing the game when it comes to both mindshare and adoption. Verifiable Certificate of Completion. Le Hudson de base, les développeurs sont en train de travailler sur Jenkins. L'Oracle D'Hudson et Jenkins ont le code. On-premise and web-based continuous integration platform that provides businesses of all sizes with plugins to build, test and … In fact, Harness built (no pun intended) native integration with Jenkins so our customers can master CI/CD. The top reviewer of Jenkins writes "Useful for us to collect and manage automatic processing pipelines". Ans. In 2004, Kohsuke Kawaguchi was a Java developer at Sun. Maven is integrated with tools JavaScript, Java, HTML5 and Tuleap. Compare Azure DevOps Services vs Jenkins. A recent Jenkins blog entry shows the raw data for sites using Jenkins and Hudson. Gérer plusieurs langues, Déployer des artefacts sur les serveurs (c’est-à-dire déployer la … It facilitates the automation process of Continuous Integration and Continuous Delivery in the Software Development process. Install Apache Tomcat Version 9 Download Jenkins war File. Ans. Eclipse Hudson by Eclipse Foundation Remove. Hudson: Jenkins: Repository - Stars: 159 - Watchers: 36 - Forks: 696 - Last Commit - More - - - Language: HTML Ancients, Continuous Integration Tags: Continuous Integration Interest over time of Hudson and Jenkins. Show transcript Unlock this title with a FREE trial . Click Finish: Find the list of jobs in the Builds section. First results from using GitHub CodeQL to discover security vulnerabilities in Jenkins plugins (www.jenkins.io) Nov 4, 2020. Remove. Hudson vs Jenkins X. Pros & Cons. buildbot vs hudson / jenkins pour une continuous integration en C ++ Workflow pour la révision de code basée sur GitHub; Comment puis-je effacer mon historique de build Jenkins / Hudson? It is the successor to the Hudson CI service. Hudson vs Jenkins: Development team responsiveness. The presentation seems to be focused on Sonatypes (positive) influence on Hudson and the changes they would like to do. Plugins. Jenkins GitHub repositories outnumber Hudson by a ratio of sixty to one. Sprievodca najväčším rozdielom medzi Jenkinsom a Hudsonom. Hudson: Jenkins: Repository - Stars: 159 - Watchers: 36 - Forks: 696 - Last Commit - More - - - Language: HTML Ancients, Continuous Integration Tags: Continuous Integration Interest over time of Hudson and Jenkins. Please mail your requirement at hr@javatpoint.com. Install Java Version 8. ), Document Jenkins on Kubernetes: Installing Jenkins on Kubernetes Documentation Release, First results from using GitHub CodeQL to discover security vulnerabilities in Jenkins plugins, 2020 Elections: Governance Board and Officer candidates, Great to build, deploy or launch anything async, Rich set of plugins with good documentation, Easily extendable with seamless integration, Workarounds needed for basic requirements, Limited abilities with declarative pipelines. Jenkins is the most popular open-source automation server that was written in a java programming language. Starting Price: Not provided by vendor Not provided by vendor Best For: Not provided by vendor. 1 Shares. Hudson is a continuous integration server for Java development. Nous nous attendons à ce que les réponses soient étayées par des faits, des références ou une expertise, mais cette question suscitera probablement un débat, des arguments, un sondage ou une discussion approfondie. On the other hand, Jenkins is most compared with Tekton, Harness, IBM Rational Build Forge, TeamCity and XebiaLabs XL Release , whereas Oracle Hudson CI is most compared with . Comment déclencher une génération uniquement si des modifications sont apscopes à un ensemble de fichiers particulier Search. Oracle de la baie d'Hudson et Jenkins ont le code. There were heroes from the Open Source community, among them Hudson’s original author, and there was everybody’s favorite villain, Oracle. Hudson is used by companies Logo Yazilim, TableAir UAB and OptoSweden AB. Jenkins is actually the renamed version of Hudson. This quickly grew into a broader question about the control of the project by Oracle. Technographics; Companies; Resources; Blog; Chrome Extension; Technographics Analysis; Login ; Get a demo; Book a full demo. Like (0) Comment (5) Save. On the other hand, the top reviewer of Jenkins writes "Useful for us to collect and manage automatic processing pipelines". The top reviewer of Jenkins writes "Useful for us to collect and manage automatic processing pipelines". Itt is megvitatjuk a Jenkins vs Hudson legfontosabb különbségeit az Infographics és az összehasonlító táblázat segítségével. See our list of best Build Automation vendors. Note: It is possible that some search terms could be used in multiple areas and that could skew some graphs. Read full review. This quickly grew into a broader question about the control of the project by Oracle. As so often happens in IT, there is no magic bullet: those who want to discuss a goal successfully need to choose the correct tool. .net - hudson vs jenkins . Short answer: Most likely, you should use Jenkins. "It all adds up to the fact that Jenkins is where the … Guide de la différence entre Jenkins et Hudson. Methods inherited from interface jenkins.scm.RunWithSCM hasParticipant; Methods inherited from interface hudson.security.AccessControlled checkAnyPermission, checkPermission, hasAnyPermission, hasPermission, hasPermission, hasPermission2; Methods inherited from interface hudson.model.DescriptorByNameOwner getDescriptorByName; Field Detail. Select Hudson (supports Jenkins) and click on Next: Provide Jenkins Server, User, and Password details. 566 verified user reviews and ratings of features, pros, cons, pricing, support and more. Jenkins X 107 Stacks. Delivery. 5. Description. Stacks 107. Jenkins and Hudson therefore continued as two independent projects, each claiming the other is the fork. They both are a key part of our Java development process. Gitlab is a self-hosted software that offers many functionalities such as code reviews, activity feeds, repository management, and issue tracking. It was first launched on Java.net in the year 2005. Localization is available in French, English, Germany, Japanese, Russian, Turkish, and Brazilian. Hudson a Oracle et Sonatype du soutien de l'entreprise et de la marque. In fact, Harness built (no pun intended) native integration with Jenkins so our customers can master CI/CD. Begge er vigtige dele af Java-udvikling. The presentation seems to be focused on Sonatypes (positive) influence on Hudson and the changes they would like to do. After having released the last post about Hudson vs. Jenkins, I have read quite a lot about this issue. Some of the common reasons to evaluate and choose Jenkins are: Hudson is a CI (continuous integration) tool which is written in Java, which runs in a servlet container such as Glassfish or Apache Tomcat application server. Lifetime Access. Pros of Hudson. The development of this platform started with Hudson while Jenkins was forked from Hudson when Sun was acquired by Oracle who aimed to develop a commercial version of the software. Jenkins and Hudson both run inside servlet containers on Java application servers, allowing for easy integration into your existing workflow. Following the same idea of Bamboo, it tackles the CI/CD methodologies to allow teams to build, test, and deploy quality software. There were heroes from the Open Source community, among them Hudson’s original author, and there was everybody’s favorite villain, Oracle. Hudson vs. Jenkins – more thoughts. Jenkins utilise le code d'Hudson et l'équipe de développement ainsi que la philosophie du projet sont restées identiques. Harness was specifically designed for Continuous Delivery and taking those artifacts into production. Hudson Follow I use this. Among those things, currently it focuses on the two jobs. Hudson vs. Jenkins Revisited. Developed by JavaTpoint. We make use of both servers and are gradually moving across all our instances to Jenkins. Built with Java, it provides over 300 plugins to support building and testing virtually any project. Hudson est un projet très actif, a une large communauté d'utilisateurs et une liste de diffusion des utilisateurs actifs, est vraiment facile à utiliser, est facile à utiliser, a été utilisé sur des projets énormes et très volumineux (JBoss, JAX-WS, etc) et a donc fait ses preuves de succès, offre de très belles avancées fonctionnalités (par exemple, construire une matrice, construire des clusters, etc), est open source, a … 566 verified user reviews and ratings of features, pros, cons, pricing, support and more. The top reviewer of IBM Rational Build Forge writes "Great reporting features and very functional". Hudson, vous aimerez Jenkins ! Jenkins was a renamed version of Hudson. Hudson builds on general-purpose building blocks. Hudson support less plugins as compare to Jenkins. Well, the headline is slightly misleading. Útmutató a Jenkins és Hudson közötti különbséghez. The development of this platform started with Hudson while Jenkins was forked from Hudson when Sun was acquired by Oracle who aimed to develop a commercial version of the software. Interest in Hudson collapsed thereafter. Jenkins is integrated with Slack, Datadog, BrowserStack, Sauce Labs, JBoss, etc. Many open source contributor was not comfortable with that which results in Jenkins, which is pretty much community-driven. Pourquoi utiliser le plug-in sonar pour Jenkins plutôt que d'utiliser simplement l'objectif maven "sonar: sonar"? Hudson and Jenkins. The development of this platform started with Hudson while Jenkins was forked from Hudson when Sun was acquired by Oracle who aimed to develop a commercial version of the software. The Jenkins community is promoting a number of bellwethers that would indicate that Hudson is losing the game when it comes to both mindshare and adoption. Remove All Products Add Product Share. ... We selected Jenkins for it's ease of use, beautiful interface, and stability. On the other hand, Jenkins is most compared with Tekton, Harness, IBM Rational Build Forge, TeamCity and XebiaLabs XL Release, whereas Oracle Hudson CI is most compared with. Posted on December 27, 2011 by Matthias. Install Suggested Plugins Q11) How can you start Jenkins manually? The story is as follows. It’s like the rename of Hudson to Jenkins like the latest one. Workaround is to upgrade to Jenkins 2.12 or later. Jenkins 2.264+: Major changes in the weekly release line, Spring and XStream updates (breaking changes! Back in February, I would have chosen Jenkins without a second thought. So, I guess up until then, there will be no real news about this topic. Hudson vs. Jenkins – Hudsons future. Top Differences .Net Core vs .Net Framework; HTML vs HTML5 ; 32-Bit vs 64 … View Details. Share. Possible future changes. When the Hudson/Jenkins fork was announced earlier this year, the case seemed pretty clear. Il descend donc à ce que Hudson vs Jenkins offre. JavaTpoint offers college campus training on Core Java, Advance Java, .Net, Android, Hadoop, PHP, Web Technology and Python. Posted on December 27, 2011 by Matthias. Verified User. Support for various authentication methods, notification, version control system, etc. Our customers typically use Jenkins for Continuous Integration use cases (build & test) that helps them take code to artifact. Integration with a large variety of tools and technologies. Hudson vs Jenkins en 2012 [fermé] 144 . Company API Private … Integrations. In a nutshell Jenkins CI is the leading open-source continuous integration server. buildEnvironments … - … Votes 0. … In the 5 weeks … Évidemment, cela cause beaucoup de maux de tête. Note: It is possible that some search terms could be used in multiple areas and that could skew some graphs. Jenkins, as a CI/CD tool, was initially created as a prototype for the Hudson as automation server. View Details. Tweet. Jenkins is extendable open source continuous integration server. Bamboo vs Jenkins: Factors to Consider. Jenkins formerly called Hudson is an automation server that was written in Java Programming Language and is open-source software. Leave us your work email ID and … Compare Azure DevOps Services vs Jenkins. Some months ago, we took a significant step in helping the Jenkins community share their stories of how they improved workflows, sped up testing, and saw better quality results after implementing Jenkins into their software development processes. Extensive control outside Hudson and this is possible because of programmable control interface. Hudson 9 Stacks. Jenkins by Jenkins View Details. Hudson - Extensible continuous Integration Server. Comment puis-je incrémenter automatiquement la version d'assemblage C#via notre plateforme CI(Hudson)? Employee in Information Technology . Since the fork, Jenkins has grown to be much more than a continuous integration solution They […] Configuration d'intégration continue de Framework 2.0 Although anyone reading news these days are probably used to worse. Our customers typically use Jenkins for Continuous Integration use cases (build & test) that helps them take code to artifact. Kubernetes integration. During November 2010, a sudden outage in the project hosting infrastructure led the development team to initiate several changes to the project infrastructure. Tools & Services Compare Tools Search Browse Tool Alternatives Browse Tool Categories Submit A Tool Job Search Stories & Blog. Eclipse Hudson by Eclipse Foundation Remove. Jenkins 2.9 - 2.11 are affected by JENKINS-35906 (causes java.lang.IllegalArgumentException: Failed to instantiate class hudson.scm.SCM). Select any job and click on Run Build to execute it from Eclipse: Try other options as an exercise. Jenkins vs Hudson Comparison Table There is no such difference between Hudson and Jenkins. March 1-11 is 337 to 34 - a 10X difference in activity. Seeing this issue has been opened and unassigned for more than 4 years , I highly doubt that the cascading project feature added by Oracle in Hudson will ever be ported to the Jenkins core or as a free plugin.. 33.96K Views. When the Hudson/Jenkins fork was announced earlier this year, the case seemed pretty clear. Other software such as Hudson and Bamboo didn't provide these abilities. (8) Mon groupe et moi-même avons horreur d'incrémenter les numéros de version d'assemblage et nous expédions fréquemment des assemblys avec des versions 1.0.0.0. When Oracle bought Sun, it took control over the Hudson name and logistic platform of Hudson. It shows about 23,000 total sites using Hudson (1.395 and before - after that Oracle has disconnected this counter from reaching the Jenkins community server) or Jenkins. Top Differences Tutorial . After recent disagreements between Oracle from one side and Hudson creators and open community on the other, the latter decided that Hudson was to be forked and... Hudson vs Jenkins CI? On-premise and web-based continuous integration platform that provides businesses of all sizes with plugins to build, test and … Je pense toujours que nous avons fait le bon choix en se déplaçant d'Hudson à Jenkins. Sonatype seems to have started a new „campaign“ on their relationship to and investments into hudson (see their latest banner on their homepage, where they state: „Maven + Hudson = a heart is shown here“). After recent disagreements between Oracle from one side and Hudson creators and open community on the other, the latter decided that Hudson was to be forked and... Hudson vs Jenkins CI? When the Jenkins/Hudson divorce came about, most of the Hudson developers (including, crucially, the original creator of the project, Kohsuke Kawaguchi) moved on to Jenkins. The following are the primary comparisons between Jenkins and Hudson: JavaTpoint offers too many high quality services. It provides an impressive browser-hosted project management dashboard. The development for Hudson began early at Sun Microsystems in 2004. Hudson vs. Jenkins Revisited. Continuous Integration vs. Jenkins is used by companies Netflix, Facebook, ebay, LinkedIn, Instacart etc. Since the fork, Jenkins has grown to be much more than a continuous integration solution They […] Jenkins GitHub repositories outnumber Hudson by a ratio of sixty to one. By the end of the year, we’ll have over 50 Jenkins user stories published with many more in the pipeline. Nous améliorons beaucoup nos … Jenkins is not only used for Continuous Integration it supports some more complex functionality. Learn More. 85% of upgrades go to Jenkins. 2 Hands-on Projects. Other software such as Hudson and Bamboo didn't provide these abilities. Read full review. IBM Rational Build Forge is rated 10.0, while Jenkins is rated 8.2. There are many benefits to both Jenkins and bamboo software, which means your choice between these two equally efficient automated tools comes down to the following factors: Budget; Preferences for user interface; Convenience of configuration and set-up (NB. donc, il s'agit de ce que Hudson vs Jenkins offre. So, I guess up until then, there will be no real news about this topic. Sorti en 2004 sous le nom d’Hudson, Jenkins est l’un des outils d’intégration continue les plus populaires. Sur le même principe que Bamboo, Jenkins permet d’utiliser les méthodologies de CI/CD pour aider les équipes à créer, tester et déployer des logiciels de qualité. Ceux qui sont encore employés par Oracle sont ceux principalement l'appui d'Hudson (pour autant que je suis conscient de l'Apache Maven personnes contribuent de bugs ainsi). Jenkins - An extendable open source continuous integration server. 2020 Elections: Governance Board and Officer candidates (www.jenkins.io) Oct 28, 2020. There is no such difference between Hudson and Jenkins. Jenkins est une application Open Source. The Jenkins and Hudson user mail lists are even more striking. Maven vs Jenkins and Hudson Jenkins and Hudson are Continuous Integration tool, commonly known as CI frameworks. Hudson is extensible through a plugin architecture, and many plugins have been made publicly available which extend it far beyond purely being a build tool for Java projects. It supports SCM tools such as Git, CVS, Perforce, ClearCase and RTC and can execute Apache Maven and Apache Ant-based projects, as well as arbitrary shell scripts and Windows batch commands. Stacks 9. During November 2010, a sudden outage in the project hosting infrastructure led the development team to initiate several changes to the project infrastructure. Followers 7 + 1. "It all adds up to the fact that Jenkins is where the … © Copyright 2011-2018 www.javatpoint.com. More news. Mail us on hr@javatpoint.com, to get more information about given services. Remove All Products Add Product Share. Every 3 months, a version (which has been deemed the most reliable by the community) is chosen. TeamCity is a build management tool and automation server that facilitates Continuous Integration. Pricing; Explore Technographics Companies Resources Blog Chrome Extension Technographics Analysis. All rights reserved. Eclipse Hudson vs Jenkins. - … Jenkins X Follow I use this. Add tool. Jenkins Vs HudsonJenkins vs Hudson Comparison TableThere is no such difference between Hudson and Jenkins. Remove. This logic has a consequence though; the product is only available if you trust the company with your code – a China critical quote from the US-residing UnME2-CEO … Jenkins a la plupart des développeurs principaux, la communauté, et (jusqu'à présent) beaucoup plus de travail réel. Hudson is used in providing easily readable URLs for most of the pages such as "last successful build" and "promoted build". C’est l’une des questions les plus intéressantes de l’entrevue avec Jenkins: elle ne vérifie pas seulement les recherches techniques que vous avez effectuées sur Jenkins, mais aussi votre profondeur dans l’historique du programme. 16+ Hours. Yesterday Sonatype announced a free webinar about the future of Hudson. ... We selected Jenkins for it's ease of use, beautiful interface, and stability. Similarly, you can compare their overall ratings, such as: overall score (Microsoft Azure: 9.0 vs. Jenkins: 8.0) and user satisfaction (Microsoft Azure: 97% vs. Jenkins: 96%). Hudson est un framework d'Intégration continue développé en langage Java par Kohsuke Kawaguchi chez Sun Microsystems, puis cédé par Oracle Corporation en 2011 au profit de la fondation Eclipse [2].. Voir aussi Articles connexes. Continuous Integration vs. Jenkins is easy to install and use. Jenkins is the continuation of the Hudson open-source project, under the original creator and towards an open-source future; Hudson is now under the Oracle's wing with more structure around it. Ici, nous discutons également des principales différences entre Jenkins et Hudson avec l'infographie et le tableau de comparaison. Duration: 1 week to 2 week. After disagreements between Oracle and Hudson creators, the latter decided that Hudson was to be forked and Jenkins CI. 85% of upgrades go to Jenkins. Pros of Jenkins X. I am very interested in the presentation from Jason van Zyl and the outcome therefor. First released back in 2004 (formerly named Hudson), Jenkins is one of the most popular CI tools available. Question 11: Quel est le lien entre Hudson et Jenkins ? Aj tu diskutujeme o kľúčových rozdieloch Jenkins vs Hudson s informačnou a porovnávacou tabuľkou. Hudson is a CI (Continuous Integration) server for Java development. As of June 2019, the Jenkins organization on GitHub had 667 project members and around 2,200 public repositories, compared with Hudson's 28 project … Hudson is a continuous integration server for Java development. Hudson was an original project which was open source and supported by Sun. Delivery. Be the first to leave a pro. Jenkins vs TeamCity; Jenkins vs Hudson; Difference between Gradle vs Maven; Jenkins Training (4 Courses, 2+ Projects) 4 Online Courses. Hudson vs Jenkins en 2012 ; Comment faire un travail Jenkins/Hudson surveiller d'autres emplois et décider de construire ou non? The following are a list of possible future changes to the plugin Oracle maintained that Hudson was continuing development and that Jenkins was a fork; the Jenkins developers considered Hudson to be the fork. Pros of Jenkins X. Pros of Hudson. This is called the Jenkins Long-Term Support (LTS) version and helps to provide the most stable and assuring version of the Jenkins CI possible. Jenkins is one of the most well known and trusted open source continuous delivery and integration services, and is usable on most desktop operating systems (and also supports being self-hosted). Jenkins is used by 60% of the developers while Hudson stands at only 3%. 2011-04-21 / 4 Comments. Yesterday Sonatype announced a free webinar about the future of Hudson. Difference Between Gitlab CI vs Jenkins. Followers 219 + 1. Jenkins is the continuation of the Hudson open-source project, under the original creator and towards an open … Join the DZone … Having been replaced by Jenkins, Hudson is no longer maintained and was announced as obsolete in February 2017. tools. Verified User. There is a utility that has been in Hudson for a long time that sends a ping back for unique IP addresses from Masters. En 2011, la situation avec Hudson et Jenkins suivait (IMHO) – Hudson était un peu stable, mais le développement de Jenkins était un peu plus rapide. Sonatype seems to have started a new „campaign“ on their relationship to and investments into hudson (see their latest banner on their homepage, where they state: „Maven + Hudson = a heart is shown here“). Jenkins bruges ikke kun til kontinuerlig integration, det understøtter noget mere kompleks funktionalitet. Jenkins 'ticket activity' is significantly higher than that of Hudson. Find how Jenkins and Hudson fare against each other in the Continuos Integration industry. Eclipse Hudson vs Jenkins. Jenkins by Jenkins View Details. Jenkins is rated 8.2, while Oracle Hudson CI is rated 0.0. Stats. Dans l'état actuel des choses, cette question ne convient pas à notre format de questions-réponses. Q10) How to install Jenkins? Jenkins – originally Hudson – was a direct response to this limitation. - No public GitHub repository available -, It monitors the execution of repeated jobs, such as building a software project or jobs run by cron. Analysis. Likewise, anticipate the state of your company tomorrow; will your business outgrow the app in the next 3-5 years? Hudson a Oracle et Sonatype support corporate et la marque. Even you can easily create your own localization bundle. Since the fork, Jenkins has grown to be much more than a CI solution. Jenkins, la plupart des principaux développeurs de la communauté et (à ce jour) beaucoup plus de travail réel. Eventually Oracle donated the remaining Hudson project assets to the Eclipse Foundation at the end of 2012. Add tool. I am very interested in the presentation from Jason van Zyl and the outcome therefor. Quelle est la situation avec “Hudson vs Jenkins” maintenant en 2012? Jenkins, créé par le fondateur d'Hudson en 2011, successeur de Hudson originel et dont le Hudson de la fondation Eclipse est un fork. Jenkins is rated 8.2, while Oracle Hudson CI is rated 0.0. 4. Tweet. Harness was specifically designed for Continuous Delivery and taking those artifacts into production. See all results. Employee in Information Technology . Gitlab is nothing but software that helps in git management which is open-source. It facilitates the automation process of continuous integration and continuous delivery (CI/CD) in the software development process. Starting Price: Not provided by vendor Not provided by vendor Best For: Not provided by vendor. Hudson is Extensible continuous integration server. Let‘s start our discussion with Travis CI – it‘s a CI server from Github, the company which openly shows its preference for mediocrity. I chose it for a reason; a desire to fix Eclipse bug 341725. Deploy Jenkins war File. The continuous build system software sector is quite competitive, with plenty of free CI alternatives to Jenkins available. My apologies. Jenkins is actually the renamed version of Hudson. Jenkins Alternatives. Ans. Back in February, I would have chosen Jenkins without a second thought. Both are vital pieces of Java Development. Jenkins bruges af 60% af udviklerne, mens Hudson kun udgør 3%. Since the split thru March 11 it is 1,109 to 159. Jenkins is actually the renamed version of Hudson.After disagreements between Oracle and Hudson creators, the latter decided that Hudson was to be forked and Jenkins CI. They allows Java project to automate build and deployment process. Jenkins is a free open source application. After disagreements between Oracle and Hudson creators, the latter decided that Hudson was to be forked and Jenkins CI. En résumé, les développeurs initiaux qui ont écrit la plus grande partie du coeur d'Hudson, ont simplement continué en travaillant sur le projet Jenkins Votes 13.

Employee Training Matrix, Easy Pumpkin Dessert Bars, Fender Meteora For Sale, Net Listing Illinois, Lavash Lafayette Yelp, Bob Debit Card Annual Charges,